%% Model Concurrent Execution for Symmetric Multicore CPU Platforms
% Use Simulink® time-based, multitask scheduling to simulate and generate code for an application algorithm captured in a single model hierarchy. The model is designed and configured for an embedded system intended to execute on a symmetric multicore, multitasking platform.
%% Periodic Multirate Model Set Up for Multitasking Concurrent Execution
% Open the example model rtwdemo_concurrent_execution. The model is configured to display color-coded sample times with annotations. To see them, after opening the model, update the diagram by pressing Ctrl+D. To display the legend, press Ctrl+J.
%
% Simulink supports simulating concurrent task execution by assigning partitions of a model to tasks that you designate to run concurrently on multicore hardware. Use an implicit or explicit approach to designating partitions.
% Simulink implicit partitioning:
% Partitions the model based on sample times specified in the model.
% Assigns a task to each sample rate and designates that the tasks run concurrently.
% Controls the granularity of partitions. For example, you cannot split a sample rate into multiple tasks.
% Does not impose modeling constraints.
% Provides ready-to-use hardware solutions, such as solutions that the Simulink® Real-Time™ product produces.
% Is not relevant to standalone production code generation due to the lack of control over partition granularity.
% Explicit partitioning:
% Use Model and Subsystem blocks to partition the model.
% Create an arbitrary number of tasks.
% Simulink assigns each partition to a task.
% Simulink imposes modeling constraints.
% Control the granularity of partitions.
% Split a sample rate into multiple tasks.
% Assign partitions to different processor cores.
% Is for standalone production code generation due to the level of control you have over granularity of partitions.
% This example shows explicit partitioning.
% Consider the following periodic multirate model that is set up for multitasking execution.
%
% Sample times for Inport blocks In1_1s and In2_2s are set to 1 and 2 seconds, respectively.
% To provide a clear partitioning of rates, sample times for models  SS1 and SS2 are set to 1.
% The Rate Transition block explicitly models a rate transition.
% To support concurrent execution of tasks in a multicore run-time environment, the preceding model was modified:
% The Integrator block is in a Model block configured with a fixed-step discrete solver and a step size of two seconds.
% Subsystems SS1 and SS2 were converted to Model blocks configured with a fixed-step discrete solver and a step size of one second.
% The Sum block is in a Model block configured with a fixed-step discrete solver and a step size of one second. Another option for the Sum block is to place it in SS1 or SS2 and compute its value coincident with the Model block. For concurrent execution of tasks, only connection blocks, Model blocks, and Subsystem blocks can be at the root level of a model.
% The Rate Transition block was removed.
%% Relevant Model Configuration Parameter Settings
% Type set to Fixed-step.
% Solver set to discrete (no continuous states).
% Treat each discrete rate as a separate task selected.
% Automatically handle rate transition for data transfer selected. Necessary because Rate Transition block was removed.
% Allow tasks to execute concurrently on target selected.
%% Concurrent Execution Parameter Settings
% Open the Concurrent Execution dialog box by clicking Configure Tasks on the Configuration Parameters Solver pane. Selecting parameter Allow tasks to execute concurrently on target enables the Configure Tasks button.
% When selected, parameter Enable explicit model partitioning for concurrent behavior enables concurrent execution options for the top-level model.
% Click Tasks and Mapping to review the tasks and mapping.
%
% Simulink creates a default mapping for each partition (Model block) by assigning each partition to a separate task. Simulink designates that each partition executes concurrently and simulates latency effects that data communication between processor cores imposes. This dialog box displays a mapping consisting of partitions spread across two independent periodic triggers: SS1, SS2, and Sum mapped to periodic trigger 1 and Integrator mapped to periodic trigger 2.
%% Scheduling
% Simulink® simulates the model based on the model configuration. Code generated from the model implements the same execution semantics. Simulink propagates and uses the Inport block sample times to order block execution based on a multicore, multitasking execution platform.
% For this model, the sample time legend shows an implicit rate grouping. Red represents the fastest discrete rate. Green represents the second fastest discrete rate.
% The generated code schedules subrates in the model. In this example, the rate for Inport block In2_2s, the green rate, is a subrate. The generated code properly transfers data between the rates.
% Benefits of implicit Simulink rate grouping:
% Simulink does not impose architectural constraints on the model. Create a model without imposing software architecture constraints within it.
% Your execution framework does not require details about underlying function scheduling and data transfers between rates. Therefore, model interface requirements are simplified. The execution framework uses generated interface code to write input, call the model step function, and read output.
% The code generator optimizes code across rates, based on multitasking execution semantics.
% Simulink enforces data transfer constraints:
% Data transfers occur between a single read task and a single write task.
% Tasks run on a single processor.
% Processes do not stop or restart, especially during data transfers between tasks.
% Read and write operations on byte-sized variables are atomic.
% Your execution framework can communicate with external devices for reading and writing model input. For example, model external devices by using Simulink S-Function blocks. Generate code for those blocks with the rest of the algorithm.
%% Generate Code and Report
% Generate code and a code generation report. The example model generates a report.
%% Review Generated Code
% From the code generation report, review the generated code.
% ert_main.c is an example main program (execution framework) for the model. This code controls model code execution by indirectly calling entry-point functions PeriodicTrigger1_OneSecond_step, PeriodicTrigger1_TwoSecond_step, and PeriodicTrigger2_OneSecond_step with the function  rtwdemo_concurrent_execution_step. Use this file as a starting point for coding your execution framework.
% rtwdemo_concurrent_execution.c contains entry points for the code that implements the model algorithm. This file includes the rate and task scheduling code.
% rtwdemo_concurrent_execution.h declares model data structures and a public interface to the model entry points and data structures.
% model_reference_types.h contains type definitions for timing bridges. These type definitions are generated for a model reference target or a model containing Model blocks.
% rtw_windows.h declares mutex and semaphore function prototypes that the generated code uses for concurrent execution on Microsoft® Windows® platforms.
% rtwtypes.h defines data types, structures, and macros that the generated code requires.
%% Code Interface
% Open and review the Code Interface Report. Use the information in that report to write the interface code for your execution framework:
% Include the generated header file by adding directive  #include rtwdemo_concurrent_execution.h.
% Write input data to the generated code for model Inport blocks.
% Call the generated entry-point functions.
% Read data from the generated code for model Outport blocks.
% Input ports:
% In1_1s of data type real_T with dimension of 1
% In2_2s of data type real_T with dimension of 1
% Entry-point functions:
% Initialization entry-point function, void rtwdemo_concurrent_execution_initialize(void). At startup, call this function once.
% Output and update entry-point (step) function, void PeriodicTrigger1_OneSecond_step(void). Call this function periodically for one of two tasks that require scheduling at the fastest rate in the model. For this model, call the function every second.
% Output and update entry-point function, void PeriodicTrigger1_TwoSecond_step(void). Call this function periodically at the second fastest rate in the model. For this model, call the function every two seconds.
% Output and update entry-point function, void PeriodicTrigger2_OneSecond_step(void). Call this function periodically for the second task that requires scheduling at the fastest rate in the model. For this model, call the function every second.
% To achieve real-time execution, define a task or thread for each entry-point step function. Trigger execution of each function based on a timer that has the same rate as the given function. The operating system schedules the tasks across cores dynamically or based on your mapping of tasks to cores.
% Output ports:
% Out1_1s of data type real_T with dimension 1
% Out2_1s of data type real_T with dimension 1
%% More About
% Multicore Processor Targets
% Deploy Generated Standalone Executable Programs To Target Hardware
% Customize Code Organization and Format
% Copyright 2010-2019 The MathWorks, Inc.